Now, if you are a fan of Soviet Surplus firearms you have surely heard of the late and great Sergei Simonov…no? Sure you have, Simonov is responsible for the SKS which happens to be one of the first weapons to use the omnipresent 7.62x39mm cartridge. We are not here today to talk about the great SKS or even Simonov’s bigger project, the tank destroying PTRS-41. We are here to talk about Simonov’s “flop” gun: the AVS-36. The AVS-36 was innovative in Russia, it was one of the earliest select-fire firearms that was produced in the world and would be responsible for a shift that would become a trademark of all Soviet firearms.
The AVS-36 was adopted by the USSR and first saw action in the Battle of Halhin Gol and then the Winter War. Though the firearm was used through the early years of the Second World War it was formally driven out of military use by 1941. The trademark image of the weapon occurred during the Winter War, when the AVS-36 and the Finnish LS-26s went head to head and both flopped tremendously. Throughout the war, the Finns saw issues with their LS-26s’ and continued to capture several hundred of the AVS-36’s and were so disappointed with it’s performance that once they could stockpile a decent number of the SVT-38 weapon (designed by Simonov’s rival Tokarev) they switched them, though they still were said to have many of the same issues. Stalin would ultimately force the AVS-36 out of military usage in favor of a Tokarev design, Stalin was said to favor Tokarev, that was to hold up better under harsh Russian conditions and easier to fire.
The AVS-36 had some unique designs for the time in which it was created. While Germany’s STG-44 and America’s Thompson were chambered in sub-rifle calibers, the Soviet’s went all in. The AVS-36 was chambered in the impressive 7.62x54R, I say impressive because if you have fired one you understand the power, this would however also prove to be a flaw in the design of the rifle. The action used a tilting-bolt design that would later be revised and simplified for use in the infamous SKS. Being an early select fire weapon, semi-auto or full-auto, called for some subtle things to be done the firearm as well. Due to the force of the large caliber and the rise of the barrel in full-auto, a large muzzle brake was added to the barrel. This muzzle brake helped reduce the barrel climb as well as reduced the recoil felt due to the large caliber. If you have ever fired a firearm with an effective muzzle break you know that this normally makes the firearm louder as well. This firearm would also be one of the first to be designed to have a detachable box magazine, in this case the magazines would hold 15 rounds of the 7.62x54R. Weighing a little over 9 lbs, the AVS-36 was not a light gun but not incredibly heavy either, even at 4′ long. The other distinguishing feature of the firearm, like most of it’s day, was that it came with a wooden stock from butt-stock to barrel (also not uncommon for Russian arms).
It has been briefly mentioned already that there were some issues with the firearm–that might be an understatement. The fatal flaw, and the one that would perhaps forever change the thinking of Soviet firearm designs, was that it would not function dirty. Seemingly small amounts of dirt and dust would stop up the gun and make it impossible to fire with field stripping and cleaning. This seems almost impossible to imagine seeing the rugged durability of the Mosin Nagant, SKS, AK-47, etc. So, instead of thinking of it negatively I will think of it as a sign that going forward, Soviet weapons would have to be able to fire in almost any conditions. Another problem the AVS-36 had was that it was chambered in too big of a caliber. I know, most of you are thinking I am an idiot, but full-auto Mosin in the 30’s? No way, and apparently the Soviets felt the same way. The muzzle brake did not work, the gun was uncontrollable on full auto, and blame was placed on the magazines being “too big”. Some of the the issues the gun had operating were in fact troop induced. The gun was not idiot proof, it was intricate and came from the factory with protective grease in it, and the soldiers were facing failures in freezing conditions. Well, if you do not clean the grease out, guess what? It freezes, gums up the action, and creates failures all over. It was a great design, and a great weapon, it was just designed without anticipation of what Russian weather and untrained soldiers would do to/with it.
With only somewhere between 30,000 and 65,000 of these guns ever built, unusual for Soviet manufacturing and no one knows the real number, there were never many of these to start with. According to many people, after the weapons were decommissioned many of them were scrapped which reduced the numbers even more. What does this mean? The AVS-36 makes for a rare, and rather collectible, piece of military surplus firearm collecting. While I could not find one of the AVS-36 for sale, the last prices I had seen on them were over $10,000–think same ballpark as a STG-44. If you are interested you could contact J&G sales or AIMsurplus, if you want ammo it can easily be found for around $12, again through people such as AIMsurplus or CheaperThanDirt. Hope you enjoyed this week’s Firearm of the Week and come back next Tuesday for another!